Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/10495/26501
Título : In vitro susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from skin and soft tissue infections to vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid, and tedizolid
Autor : Vanegas Múnera, Johanna Marcela
Ocampo Ríos, Ana María
Montoya Urrego, Daniela
Jiménez Quiceno, Judy Natalia
metadata.dc.subject.*: Antibacterianos
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Linezolid
Vancomicina
Vancomycin
Daptomicina
Daptomycin
Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos
Soft Tissue Infections
Fecha de publicación : 2017
Editorial : Elsevier
Citación : Vanegas Múnera JM, Ocampo Ríos AM, Urrego DM, Jiménez Quiceno JN. In vitro susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from skin and soft tissue infections to vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid and tedizolid. Braz J Infect Dis. 2017 Sep-Oct;21(5):493-499. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.03.010.
Resumen : ABSTRACT : Introduction: Treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-positive infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus remains as a clinical challenge due to emergence of new resistance mechanisms. Tedizolid is a next-generation oxazolidinone, recently approved for skin and soft tissues infections. We conducted a study to determine in vitro susceptibility to vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid and tedizolid in MRSA clinical isolates from adult patients with skin and soft tissue infections. Material and methods: Methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates were collected in three tertiarycare hospitals of Medellin, Colombia, from February 2008 to June 2010 as part of a previous study. Clinical characteristics were assessed by medical records and MIC values were determined by Epsilometer test. Genotypic analysis included spa typing, MLST, and SCCmec typing. Results: A total of 150 MRSA isolates were evaluated and tedizolid MIC values obtained showed higher in vitro activity than other antimicrobials, with MIC values ranging from 0.13g/mL to 0.75g/mL and lower values of MIC50 and MIC90 (0.38g/mL and 0.5g/mL). In contrast, vancomycin and linezolid had higher MIC values, which ranged from 0.5g/mL to 2.0g/mL and from 0.38g/mL to 4.0g/mL, respectively. Tedizolid MICs were 2- to 5-fold lower than those of linezolid. Clinical characteristics showed high previous antimicrobial use and hospitalization history. The majority of the strains belong to the CC8 harboring the SCCmec IVc and were associated with the spa t1610 (29.33%, n = 44). Conclusion: In vitro effectiveness of tedizolid was superior for isolates from skin and soft tissue infections in comparison with the other antibiotics evaluated. The above added to its less toxicity, good bioavailability, daily dose and unnecessity of dosage adjustment, make tedizolid in a promising alternative for the treatment of infections caused by MRSA.
metadata.dc.identifier.eissn: 1678-4391
ISSN : 1413-8670
metadata.dc.identifier.doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.03.010
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos de Revista en Microbiología

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
MontoyaDaniela_2017_StaphylococcusAureusIsolates.pdfArtículo de investigación840.59 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons