Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/10495/29713
Título : Incidence and risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia in a developing country: Where is the difference?
Otros títulos : Incidencia y factores de riesgo de neumonía asociada a ventilación mecánica en un país en desarrollo: ¿dónde está la diferencia?
Autor : Jaimes Barragán, Fabián Alberto
De La Rosa Echávez, Gisela Del Carmen
Gómez Vásquez, Emiliano
Múnera, Paola
Ramírez Rivera, Jaime
Castrillón, Sebastián
metadata.dc.subject.*: Neumonía
Pneumonia
Factores de Riesgo
Factores de Riesgo
Risk Factors
Epidemiología
Epidemiology
Estudios prospectivos
Prospective Studies
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos
Intensive Care Units
Incidencia
Incidence
Ventilator-associated pneumonia
Fecha de publicación : 2007
Editorial : Elsevier
Citación : Jaimes F, De La Rosa G, Gómez E, Múnera P, Ramírez J, Castrillón S. Incidence and risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia in a developing country: where is the difference? Respir Med. 2007 Apr;101(4):762-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.08.008. Epub 2006 Oct 4. PMID: 17027247.
Resumen : ABSTRACT: Background Latin America exhibits a wide range of differences, compared to developed nations, in genetic background, health services, and clinical research development. It is valid to hypothesize that the incidence and risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in our setting may be substantially different of those reported elsewhere. We conducted a study to determine the incidence and risk factors for VAP in a University Hospital from Medellin, Colombia. Methods Prospective cohort study in three intensive care units (ICU) (surgical/trauma, medical, cardiovascular) in a 550-bed University Hospital. Critically ill patients (n=270) who required at least 48 h of mechanical ventilation (MV) between June 2002 and October 2003 were followed until ICU discharge, VAP diagnosis or death. Results Sixty patients (22.2%) developed VAP 5.9±3.6 days after admission. The overall incidence of VAP was 29 cases per 1000 ventilator-days. The daily hazard for developing VAP increased until day 8, and then decreased over the duration of stay in the ICU. The only statistically significant factor after multivariable analysis was gender, with being female reducing 57% the risk of pneumonia (hazard ratios (HR): 0.43; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.19–0.96). Conclusions The epidemiologic profile of VAP in terms of incidence, length of stay and clinical course resembles the general pattern described everywhere. Surprisingly, we could not identify any potentially modifiable risk factor for VAP. A comprehensive multicenter study is warranted. It should provide deep insight about the specific microbiological, genetic and clinic features of VAP in our setting.
metadata.dc.identifier.eissn: 1532-3064
ISSN : 0954-6111
metadata.dc.identifier.doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.08.008
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos de Revista en Ciencias Médicas

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
JaimesFabian_2007_RiskVentilatorPneumonia.pdfArtículo de investigación219.73 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons