Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/10495/39151
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorSanabria Quiroga, Álvaro Enrique-
dc.contributor.authorOlivera, María Paula-
dc.contributor.authorChiesa Estomba, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorHamoir, Marc-
dc.contributor.authorKowalski, Luiz P-
dc.contributor.authorLópez, ernando-
dc.contributor.authorMäkitie, Antti-
dc.contributor.authorRobbins, K Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorRodrigo, Juan Pablo-
dc.contributor.authorPiazza, Cesare-
dc.contributor.authorShaha, Ashok-
dc.contributor.authorSjögren, Elizabeth-
dc.contributor.authorSuarez, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorZafereo, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorFerlito, Alfio-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-26T20:55:39Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-26T20:55:39Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationSanabria A, Olivera MP, Chiesa-Estomba C, Hamoir M, Kowalski LP, López F, Mäkitie A, Robbins KT, Rodrigo JP, Piazza C, Shaha A, Sjögren E, Suarez C, Zafereo M, Ferlito A. Pharyngeal Reconstruction Methods to Reduce the Risk of Pharyngocutaneous Fistula After Primary Total Laryngectomy: A Scoping Review. Adv Ther. 2023 Sep;40(9):3681-3696. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02561-7. Epub 2023 Jul 12. Erratum in: Adv Ther. 2023 Aug 1;: PMID: 37436593; PMCID: PMC10427525.spa
dc.identifier.issn0741-238X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10495/39151-
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT: Introduction: The most common early postoperative complication after total laryngectomy (TL) is pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF). Rates of PCF are higher in patients who undergo salvage TL compared with primary TL. Published meta-analyses include heterogeneous studies making the conclusions difficult to interpret. The objectives of this scoping review were to explore the reconstructive techniques potentially available for primary TL and to clarify which could be the best technique for each clinical scenario. Methods: A list of available reconstructive techniques for primary TL was built and the potential comparisons between techniques were identified. A PubMed literature search was performed from inception to August 2022. Only case-control, comparative cohort, or randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies were included. Results: A meta-analysis of seven original studies showed a PCF risk difference (RD) of 14% (95% CI 8-20%) favoring stapler closure over manual suture. In a meta-analysis of 12 studies, we could not find statistically significant differences in PCF risk between primary vertical suture and T-shaped suture. Evidence for other pharyngeal closure alternatives is scarce. Conclusion: We could not identify differences in the rate of PCF between continuous and T-shape suture configuration. Stapler closure seems to be followed by a lower rate of PCF than manual suture in those patients that are good candidates for this technique.spa
dc.format.extent16 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherSpringerspa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/co/*
dc.titlePharyngeal Reconstruction Methods to Reduce the Risk of Pharyngocutaneous Fistula After Primary Total Laryngectomy: A Scoping Reviewspa
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.publisher.groupTrauma y Cirugíaspa
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12325-023-02561-7-
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.identifier.eissn1865-8652-
oaire.citationtitleAdvances in Therapyspa
oaire.citationstartpage1spa
oaire.citationendpage16spa
oaire.citationvolume40spa
oaire.citationissue9spa
dc.rights.creativecommonshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.publisher.placeNueva York, Estados Unidosspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcspa
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREVspa
dc.type.localArtículo de revisiónspa
dc.subject.decsFístula Cutánea-
dc.subject.decsCutaneous Fistula-
dc.subject.decsNeoplasias Laríngeas-
dc.subject.decsLaryngeal Neoplasms-
dc.subject.decsLaringectomía-
dc.subject.decsLaryngectomy-
dc.subject.decsEnfermedades Faríngeas-
dc.subject.decsPharyngeal Diseases-
dc.subject.decsProcedimientos de Cirugía Plástica-
dc.subject.decsPlastic Surgery Procedures-
dc.subject.decsComplicaciones Posoperatorias-
dc.subject.decsPostoperative Complications-
dc.subject.decsEstudios Retrospectivos-
dc.subject.decsRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.proposalFístula Cutáneaspa
dc.description.researchgroupidCOL0016612spa
dc.subject.meshurihttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D017577-
dc.subject.meshurihttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D007822-
dc.subject.meshurihttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D007825-
dc.subject.meshurihttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D010608-
dc.subject.meshurihttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D011183-
dc.subject.meshurihttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D012189-
dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrevAdv. Ther.spa
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos de Revista en Ciencias Médicas

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
SanabriaAlvaro_2023_Pharyngeal_Reconstruction_Methods.pdfArtículo de revisión1.19 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons