Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/10495/41364
Título : Sizing Assessment of Islanded Microgrids Considering Total Investment Cost and Tax Benefits in Colombia
Autor : Ropero Castaño, Wilmer
Muñoz Galeano, Nicolás
López Lezama, Jesús María
Maya Duque, Pablo Andrés
Caicedo Bravo, Eduardo Francisco
metadata.dc.subject.*: Renewable energy sources
Fuentes de energía renonvable
Optimization
Optimización
Islanded microgrids
Off-grid areas
Áreas fuera de la red
http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85112837
http://vocabularies.unesco.org/thesaurus/concept6659
Fecha de publicación : 2022
Editorial : MDPI
Citación : W. Ropero-Castaño, N. Muñoz-Galeano, E. F. Caicedo-Bravo, P. Maya-Duque, y J. M. López-Lezama, «Sizing Assessment of Islanded Microgrids Considering Total Investment Cost and Tax Benefits in Colombia», Energies, vol. 15, n.o 14, pp. 1-24, 2022, [En línea]. Disponible en: https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5161-:d:864113.
Resumen : ABSTRACT: This paper deals with the optimal sizing of islanded microgrids (MGs), which use diesel generators to supply energy in off-grid areas. The MG under study integrates photovoltaic (PV) and diesel generation, a battery energy storage System (BESS), and an inverter for the connection between AC and DC voltage buses. Levelised cost of energy (LCOE) and annual system cost (ASC) are considered economic indicators, while the loss of power supply probability (LPSP) is used as a reliability indicator. Fiscal incentives such as the tax benefits and accelerated depreciation applied in Colombia are considered for the optimally sizing of each MG element. Solar measurements were taken at a weather station located in the main campus of Universidad de Antioquia in Medellin, Colombia at a latitude of 6.10 and longitude of -75.38. The objective function is the minimization of the total energy delivered from the power sources that successfully meets the load. The model was implemented in Python programming language considering several scenarios. Two cases were evaluated: the first one considered PV panels, a BESS and a diesel generator, while the second one only considered PV panels and a BESS. The option that does not include the diesel generator turned out to be the most expensive, since additional PV and BESS resources are required to meet the load profile. Furthermore, it was found that the LCOE was lower when tax benefits were taken into account.
metadata.dc.identifier.eissn: 1996-1073
metadata.dc.identifier.doi: 10.3390/en15145161
metadata.dc.relatedidentifier.url: https://hdl.handle.net/10495/28328
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos de Revista en Ingeniería

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
RoperoWilmer_2022_Sizing_Assessment_Islanded_Microgrids.pdfArtículo de investigación983.47 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
RoperoWilmer_2022_Sizing_Assessment_Islanded_Microgrids.epubArtículo de investigación2.11 MBEPUBVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons