Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/10495/42169
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorBuendía Rodríguez, Jefferson Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorGuerrero Patiño, Diana-
dc.contributor.authorZuluaga Salazar, Andrés Felipe-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-16T15:09:58Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-16T15:09:58Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationBuendía JA, Guerrero Patiño D, Zuluaga Salazar AF. Efficacy of adjunctive inhaled colistin and tobramycin for ventilator-associated pneumonia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pulm Med. 2024 May 2;24(1):213spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10495/42169-
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT: Introduction,Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) presents a significant challenge in intensive care units (ICUs). Nebulized antibiotics, particularly colistin and tobramycin, are commonly prescribed for VAP patients. However, the appropriateness of using inhaled antibiotics for VAP remains a subject of debate among experts. This study aims to provide updated insights on the efficacy of adjunctive inhaled colistin and tobramycin through a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods A thorough search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, COCHRANE Central, and clinical trials databases (www.clinicaltrials.gov) from inception to June 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting specific inclusion criteria were selected for analysis. These criteria included mechanically ventilated patients diagnosed with VAP, intervention with inhaled Colistin and Tobramycin compared to intravenous antibiotics, and reported outcomes such as clinical cure, microbiological eradication, mortality, or adverse events. Results The initial search yielded 106 records, from which only seven RCTs fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed a higher likelihood of achieving both clinical and microbiological cure in the groups receiving tobramycin or colistin compared to the control group. The relative risk (RR) for clinical cure was 1.23 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.45), and for microbiological cure, it was 1.64 (95% CI: 1.31, 2.06). However, there were no significant differences in mortality or the probability of adverse events between the groups. Conclusion Adjunctive inhaled tobramycin or colistin may have a positive impact on the clinical and microbiological cure rates of VAP. However, the overall quality of evidence is low, indicating a high level of uncertainty. These findings underscore the need for further rigorous and well-designed studies to enhance the quality of evidence and provide more robust guidance for clinical decision-making in the management of VAP.spa
dc.format.extent8 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherBMC (BioMed Central)spa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/co/*
dc.titleEfficacy of adjunctive inhaled colistin and tobramycin for ventilator-associated pneumonia: systematic review and meta-analysisspa
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.publisher.groupGrupo de Investigación en Farmacología y Toxicologíaspa
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12890-024-03032-7-
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2466-
oaire.citationtitleBMC Pulmonary Medicinespa
oaire.citationstartpage1spa
oaire.citationendpage8spa
oaire.citationvolume24spa
oaire.citationissue1spa
dc.rights.creativecommonshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.publisher.placeLondres, Inglaterraspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcspa
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREVspa
dc.type.localArtículo de revisiónspa
dc.subject.decsAntibacterianos-
dc.subject.decsAnti-Bacterial Agents-
dc.subject.decsColistina-
dc.subject.decsColistin-
dc.subject.decsUnidades de Cuidados Intensivos-
dc.subject.decsIntensive Care Units-
dc.subject.decsNeumonía Asociada al Ventilador-
dc.subject.decsPneumonia, Ventilator-Associated-
dc.subject.decsEnsayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto-
dc.subject.decsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic-
dc.subject.decsRespiracion, Artificial-
dc.subject.decsRespiration, Artificial-
dc.subject.decsTobramicina-
dc.subject.decsTobramycin-
dc.subject.decsResultado del Tratamiento-
dc.subject.decsTreatment Outcome-
dc.description.researchgroupidCOL0039902spa
dc.subject.meshurihttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D003091-
dc.subject.meshurihttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000900-
dc.subject.meshurihttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D007362-
dc.subject.meshurihttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D053717-
dc.subject.meshurihttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D016032-
dc.subject.meshurihttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D014031-
dc.subject.meshurihttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D012121-
dc.subject.meshurihttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D016896-
dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrevBMC Pulm. Med.spa
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos de Revista en Ciencias Médicas

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
BuendiaJefferson_2024_Efficacy_Adjunctive_Inhaled.pdfArtículo de revisión1.72 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons