Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/10495/44205
Título : Priority setting for pandemic preparedness and response: A comparative analysis of COVID-19 pandemic plans in 12 countries in the Eastern Mediterranean Region
Autor : Vélez, Claudia Marcela
Razavi, S Donya
Noorulhuda, Mariam
Kapiriri, Lydia
Aguilera Dreyse, Bernardo
Danis, Marion
Essue, Beverly
Goold, Susan D.
Nouvet, Elysée
Williams, Iestyn
metadata.dc.subject.*: COVID-19
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000086382
Preparación para una Pandemia
Pandemic Preparedness
Planificación en Salud
Health Planning
Pandemias
Pandemics
Región Mediterránea
Mediterranean Region
Conflictos Armados
Armed Conflicts
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000096763
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D006285
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D058873
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D019083
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000068337
Fecha de publicación : 2022
Editorial : Elsevier
Citación : Razavi SD, Noorulhuda M, Marcela Velez C, Kapiriri L, Dreyse BA, Danis M, Essue B, Goold SD, Nouvet E, Williams I. Priority setting for pandemic preparedness and response: A comparative analysis of COVID-19 pandemic plans in 12 countries in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Health Policy Open. 2022 Dec;3:100084. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2022.100084.
Resumen : ABSTRACT: Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted health systems and exacerbated pre-existing resource gaps in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (WHO-EMRO). Active humanitarian and refugee crises have led to mass population displacement and increased health system fragility, which has implication for equitable priority setting (PS). We examine whether and how PS was included in national COVID-19 pandemic plans within EMRO. Methods: An analysis of COVID-19 pandemic response and preparedness planning documents from a sample of 12/22 countries in WHO-EMRO. We assessed the degree to which documented PS processes adhere to twenty established quality parameters of effective PS. Results: While all reviewed plans addressed some aspect of PS, none included all quality parameters. Yemen's plan included the highest number (9) of quality parameters, while Egypt's addressed the lowest (3). Most plans used evidence in their planning processes. While no plans explicitly identify equity as a criterion to guide PS; many identified vulnerable populations - a key component of equitable PS. Despite high concentrations of refugees, migrants, and IDPs in EMRO, only a quarter of the plans identified them as vulnerable. Conclusion: PS setting challenges are exacerbated by conflict and the resulting health system fragmentation. Systematic and quality PS is essential to tackle long-term health implications of COVID-19 for vulnerable populations in this region, and to support effective PS and equitable resource allocation.
metadata.dc.identifier.eissn: 2590-2296
metadata.dc.identifier.doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2022.100084
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos de Revista en Ciencias Médicas

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
VelezClaudia_2022_Priority_Setting_COVID19.pdfArtículo de investigación379.37 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons