Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://hdl.handle.net/10495/44205
Título : | Priority setting for pandemic preparedness and response: A comparative analysis of COVID-19 pandemic plans in 12 countries in the Eastern Mediterranean Region |
Autor : | Vélez, Claudia Marcela Razavi, S Donya Noorulhuda, Mariam Kapiriri, Lydia Aguilera Dreyse, Bernardo Danis, Marion Essue, Beverly Goold, Susan D. Nouvet, Elysée Williams, Iestyn |
metadata.dc.subject.*: | COVID-19 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000086382 Preparación para una Pandemia Pandemic Preparedness Planificación en Salud Health Planning Pandemias Pandemics Región Mediterránea Mediterranean Region Conflictos Armados Armed Conflicts https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000096763 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D006285 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D058873 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D019083 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000068337 |
Fecha de publicación : | 2022 |
Editorial : | Elsevier |
Citación : | Razavi SD, Noorulhuda M, Marcela Velez C, Kapiriri L, Dreyse BA, Danis M, Essue B, Goold SD, Nouvet E, Williams I. Priority setting for pandemic preparedness and response: A comparative analysis of COVID-19 pandemic plans in 12 countries in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Health Policy Open. 2022 Dec;3:100084. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2022.100084. |
Resumen : | ABSTRACT: Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted health systems and exacerbated pre-existing resource gaps in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (WHO-EMRO). Active humanitarian and refugee crises have led to mass population displacement and increased health system fragility, which has implication for equitable priority setting (PS). We examine whether and how PS was included in national COVID-19 pandemic plans within EMRO. Methods: An analysis of COVID-19 pandemic response and preparedness planning documents from a sample of 12/22 countries in WHO-EMRO. We assessed the degree to which documented PS processes adhere to twenty established quality parameters of effective PS. Results: While all reviewed plans addressed some aspect of PS, none included all quality parameters. Yemen's plan included the highest number (9) of quality parameters, while Egypt's addressed the lowest (3). Most plans used evidence in their planning processes. While no plans explicitly identify equity as a criterion to guide PS; many identified vulnerable populations - a key component of equitable PS. Despite high concentrations of refugees, migrants, and IDPs in EMRO, only a quarter of the plans identified them as vulnerable. Conclusion: PS setting challenges are exacerbated by conflict and the resulting health system fragmentation. Systematic and quality PS is essential to tackle long-term health implications of COVID-19 for vulnerable populations in this region, and to support effective PS and equitable resource allocation. |
metadata.dc.identifier.eissn: | 2590-2296 |
metadata.dc.identifier.doi: | 10.1016/j.hpopen.2022.100084 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Artículos de Revista en Ciencias Médicas |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
VelezClaudia_2022_Priority_Setting_COVID19.pdf | Artículo de investigación | 379.37 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons