Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/10495/14448
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorGranda Carvajal, Catalina-
dc.contributor.authorHamann, Franz-
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-19T18:10:40Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-19T18:10:40Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10495/14448-
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT: This article examines the aggregate implications of several policies aimed at removing barriers to formality. To this end, we build a dynamic equilibrium model in which heterogeneous agents choose to work for a wage or operate a technology in the formal or informal sector, based on the costs and benefits associated with these occupational choices. Formality entails compliance with taxes, a minimum wage scheme, and firm operation costs but has a productivity advantage stemming from access to external finance and legal enforcement mechanisms. Informal activities avoid taxes and regulations without detection or punishment. The simulation results suggest that eliminating formal operation fees leads to firm formalization, earnings redistribution, and increases in total factor productivity and welfare. In addition, eliminating the income tax reduces labor informality. These two policies, taken together, generate full formalization and gains in redistribution, efficiency, and welfare that are even greater than when all the barriers to formality are jointly removed. In contrast, eliminating the minimum wage has strong adverse effects on labor formalization and little impact on productivity. Elimi¬nating the payroll tax leaves the occupational composition nearly unchanged and productivity and welfare as well.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherFederal Reserve Bank of St. Louisspa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CO)*
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.titleOn the Aggregate Implications of Removing Barriers to Formalityspa
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.identifier.doidoi.org/10.20955/r.102.203-20-
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.citationtitleFederal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Reviewspa
dc.rights.creativecommonshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.publisher.placeEstados Unidosspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.localArtículo de investigaciónspa
dc.subject.lembEconomía informal-
dc.subject.lembInformal sector (Economics)-
dc.subject.ocdeImpuestos-
dc.subject.ocdeTaxes-
dc.subject.ocdePolítica laboral-
dc.subject.ocdeLabour policy-
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos de Revista en Ciencias Económicas

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
GrandaCarvajalCatalina_2020-AggregateImplicationsRemoving.pdfArtículo de investigación365.99 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons