Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/10495/43304
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorVélez Bernal, Iván Darío-
dc.contributor.authorLópez Carvajal, Liliana-
dc.contributor.authorArbeláez Montoya, María Patricia-
dc.contributor.authorOlliaro, Piero-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-08T19:35:43Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-08T19:35:43Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationLópez-Carvajal L, Vélez I, Arbeláez MP, Olliaro P. Eligibility criteria and outcome measures adopted in clinical trials of treatments of cutaneous leishmaniasis: systematic literature review covering the period 1991-2015. Trop Med Int Health. 2018 May;23(5):448-475. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13048.spa
dc.identifier.issn1360-2276-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10495/43304-
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT: Objective: To document the sources of heterogeneity in outcomes and shortcomings in trial designs reported by previous systematic reviews. Methods: Systematic review of clinical trials of CL treatments published since 1991, to assess and compare eligibility criteria and outcome measures in trials (any type of treatment) of CL (any form) reported before and after the publication of the CONSORT statement. Results: We identified 106 eligible trials published between 1991 and 2015, 74% after the 2001 CONSORT statement; 58% (n = 63) were on Old-World CL and 37% (n = 40) in New-World CL; overall, 11 531 patients enrolled in 243 treatment groups on 30 different treatments. Both requirements and definitions for eligibility and outcome criteria varied. Compliance with CONSORT requirements increased for studies published after the 2010 update. As for entry criteria, 94% of studies had a requirement for sex (74% of those enrolling also women excluded those who were pregnant or lactating), 69% for age (variable age ranges), 99% parasitological confirmation, 43% prior duration of illness (14% excluded cases with previous episodes), 46% defined the number, 28% the size and 13% the type of lesions (27% with restrictions as to their anatomical location). Follow-up ranged 1-24 months, with 14% and 91% of studies, respectively, having defined initial and final cure. Conclusions: This review documents changes in reporting before and after the publication of the CONSORT statement. Lack of standardisation, compounded with the small number of trials relative to the magnitude of the disease in its multiple forms, and with the range of treatments tested explains why evidence to inform treatment guidelines is generally weak for CL. Adopting standardised methodologies will improve the quality and consistency of clinical trials, and ultimately yield better treatments for CL.spa
dc.format.extent28 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherWileyspa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/co/*
dc.titleEligibility criteria and outcome measures adopted in clinical trials of treatments of cutaneous leishmaniasis: systematic literature review covering the period 1991–2015spa
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.publisher.groupEpidemiologíaspa
dc.publisher.groupPrograma de Estudio y Control de Enfermedades Tropicales (PECET)spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/tmi.13048-
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.identifier.eissn1365-3156-
oaire.citationtitleTropical Medicine and International Healthspa
oaire.citationstartpage448spa
oaire.citationendpage475spa
oaire.citationvolume23spa
oaire.citationissue5spa
dc.rights.creativecommonshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.publisher.placeOxford, Inglaterraspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcspa
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREVspa
dc.type.localArtículo de revisiónspa
dc.subject.decsLeishmaniasis Cutánea-
dc.subject.decsLeishmaniasis, Cutaneous-
dc.subject.decsEvaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud-
dc.subject.decsOutcome Assessment, Health Care-
dc.subject.decsFactores de Edad-
dc.subject.decsAge Factors-
dc.subject.decsEnsayos Clínicos como Asunto - normas-
dc.subject.decsClinical Trials as Topic - standards-
dc.description.researchgroupidCOL0015099spa
dc.description.researchgroupidCOL0004362spa
dc.subject.meshurihttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D016773-
dc.subject.meshurihttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D017063-
dc.subject.meshurihttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000367-
dc.subject.meshurihttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D002986-
dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrevTrop. Med. Int. Health.spa
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos de Revista en Ciencias Médicas

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
LópezLiliana_2018_TropicalLesionsCONSORT.pdfArtículo de investigación508.76 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons