Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/10495/29518
Título : Systematic review of qualitative studies about malaria in Colombia
Autor : Cardona Arias, Jaiberth Antonio
Salas Zapata, Walter Alfredo
Carmona Fonseca, Jaime
metadata.dc.subject.*: Salud Ambiental
Environmental Health
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia
Evidence-Based Medicine
Enfermedades Transmisibles
Communicable Diseases
Malaria
Antropología Cultural
Anthropology, Cultural
Teoría Fundamentada
Grounded Theory
Revisión Sistemática
Systematic Review
Investigación acción participativa
Participatory action research
Fecha de publicación : 2020
Editorial : Elsevier
Citación : Cardona-Arias JA, Salas-Zapata W, Carmona-Fonseca J. Systematic review of qualitative studies about malaria in Colombia. Heliyon. 2020 May 18;6(5):e03964. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03964.
Resumen : ABSTRACT : Introduction: The research about malaria in Colombia has centered mainly on the biomedical (clinical, parasitological, epidemiological and entomological) field, with little focus on qualitative research. Purpose: Analyzing social categories related to malaria in Colombia, based on qualitative studies published among scientific literature. Methods: Systematic review following Cochrane and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) recommendations. An ex-ante protocol was applied, comprehensive and reproducible for the search, screening, and extraction of information. Methodological quality was evaluated through SRQR (Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research). Results: 10 studies complied with the protocol; these studies interviewed 500 infected or exposed subjects, program administrators, health professionals, and indigenous people. 40 categories were identified, which account for social-economical, cultural and ecological determiners of malaria; insights and ways to understand the disease at an individual level; malaria consequences, and medical attention, disease control and elimination actions. Conclusion: A wide variety of populations and subjects was considered. They show similar qualitative evidence on structural determiners, family-individual effects, and ways to understand malaria. Motivations to participate in disease interventions are less known, and they constitute the central axis for subsequent studies aimed to improve community engagement in disease control and elimination initiatives.
metadata.dc.identifier.eissn: 2405-8440
metadata.dc.identifier.doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03964
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos de Revista en Microbiología

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
CardonaJaiberth_2020_QualitativeStudiesMalaria.pdfArtículo de revisión1.53 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons